Recently I was musing about the army that is resurrected from the valley of dry bones in Ezekiel 37. There, after all the rattling of the bones and the growing of the sinews and the flesh, a mighty army stands up, an exceedingly great army on its feet and ready for battle. But then I thought, “Who will lead this army, this mighty army of God?” So I wrote an article about that. Read my thoughts on who this leader might be in my article, “Who Will Lead This Army?” on a separate page of the blog. I hope you like it.
Uncategorized
“Thoughts on Dealing with Bad Behavior” and “Who is Jacob (or Israel or Zion)?”
HOW DO WE EXPLAIN OUR EVIL BEHAVIOR?
A couple of days ago I added a page to “Roy’s Reflections” in which I was thinking through how most of the world tries to address evil and sinful behavior and why these approaches don’t work. These approaches don’t work because they dismiss and intentionally ignore the central problem, which is the basic sinfulness of man. Any approach to evil behavior that ignores man’s fundamental problem is bound to fail. Anyway, you may enjoy reading what I said and seeing if you agree or disagree with me. It’s a separate page of the blog. (“How Does the World Approach the Problem of Evil Behavior?”)
WHO IS “JACOB” IN THE OLD TESTAMENT? THEOLOGICAL STUDY FROM PSALM 24 (#54)
I have been reading through the Psalms in my morning devotional time and have been thrilled to find more gems in psalms that I have read many times. One of the beauties of the Bible is that no matter how many times you have read a given text, there are still treasures to be discovered. As I was reading Psalm 24, I was again struck by the concept of “Jacob” expressed in verse 6. The passage reads that the person who may ascend the hill of the LORD “shall receive a blessing from the LORD and righteousness from the God of his salvation. This is the generation of those who seek Him, who seek Your face – even Jacob.” (Psalm 24:5-6 NASB) Now the question I am asking and proposing to answer is, “Who is this ‘Jacob’?”
IS “JACOB” ETHNIC ISRAEL?
A quick answer might be that Jacob is another word for ethnic Israel, which in this context would mean the Hebrews or the Jews. It means the people of Israel, the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who lived in the Promised Land in Old Testament times. That would be the quick answer. But as we examine the passage carefully, the quick answer does not appear to be the correct answer. Notice how “Jacob” is described here in this psalm. “This is the generation of those who seek Him, Who seek the LORD’s face.” Clearly seeking the LORD’s face describes only a very small portion of the Hebrew people who lived in Canaan during ancient times. Most of the Hebrews either lived with scant attention paid to the LORD or they lived in open rebellion to the law of the LORD. Few actively sought the LORD’s face. Reading further in the psalm, we see that “Jacob” has clean hands and a pure heart and has not sworn deceitfully. In other words, “Jacob” lives with integrity and exhibits practical righteousness in his life. Again, only a few in ancient Israel would qualify for these accolades. No honest reading of the Old Testament would ascribe to the Jews of ancient Israel these characteristics. So the godly character attributed to “Jacob” in Psalm 24 is not exhibited by the nation of Israel as presented in the Old Testament. But in addition to that, notice what is promised to “Jacob” in this psalm. “Jacob” is promised to “receive a blessing from the LORD and righteousness from the God of his salvation.” The blessing mentioned here refers to favor from the LORD. It refers to grace in terms of God’s unmerited favor. Those who received this blessing lived righteous lives as a result of receiving God’s grace. In Israel there were few individuals who displayed righteous lives, and “righteous” certainly does not describe the nation of Israel as a whole. “Jacob” also received righteousness. From the New Testament we know that there is none righteous, not even one, so that anyone who is righteous has had that righteousness imputed to him from God Himself. In other words, any righteousness man receives is an alien righteousness that is his by imputation. Finally notice that “Jacob” received righteousness from the God of his “salvation.” This means that “Jacob” is saved from his sins. From the New Testament again we know more about salvation than we can glean from the Old, but it must be acknowledged that among Old Testament national Israel (“Jacob”) there was only a remnant that was saved. There were few who knew the God of their salvation and many who instead bowed down to the Baals. From these observations and this reasoning, I must reach the conclusion that “Jacob” as used here in this psalm certainly does not refer to national, ethnic “Jacob” (“Israel”) since the characteristics of “Jacob” in this psalm are very different from the characteristics of the nation of Israel presented to us in the Old Testament Scriptures.
So then, if “Jacob” does not refer to national Israel, the physical descendants of Jacob, who is the “Jacob” mentioned here? The answer is important in reading the Old Testament and in understanding prophecy. Let’s examine “Jacob” as described by this verse (Psalm 24:6) and see if we can find a likely suspect. We read that the “Jacob” described here is the generation that seeks the LORD’s face. Who could that generation be, this generation that actively seeks the LORD’s face, and where could we find such a generation? Although the performance varies according to their sanctification, the people who actively seek the LORD’s face are the people the New Testament calls the church, the “generation” identified as the followers of Jesus. Throughout the New Testament those who claim to follow Jesus are called to seek the Lord and to strive for righteous living. Then is “Jacob” in the Old Testament the word for the true followers of the Lord, whom the New Testament will describe as followers of Jesus? Maybe so. To test this theory, let’s see what else we see in Psalm 24. In verse 4 we see that “Jacob” has clean hands and a pure heart. Again, this is a description of what the Scripture requires believers to have. Believers are to live morally clean lives and to have a pure heart before God (Matthew 5:8). So again the Bible’s description of the believer agrees with this verse’s reference to “Jacob.” Finally in Psalm 24:5 we read that “Jacob” is promised to “receive a blessing from the LORD and righteousness from the God of his salvation.” Now this description is exactly how the Bible describes believers. Believers have received the unmerited favor of God in their being chosen for salvation and they have received the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ through their faith in Him. Theologically there is no group of people, indeed, there is not even an individual person who is declared righteous except those who have received that righteousness through faith in Jesus Christ. “There is none righteous, not even one (Romans 3:10).” That is, the only ones who are righteous are the true followers of Jesus. So on all the counts it appears that the “Jacob” described in these verses is not the nation of Israel, but is that small remnant who truly worshiped and obeyed Yahweh.
CONCLUSION: THE IDENTITY OF “JACOB”
My conclusion, then, is that, when the Old Testament refers to “Jacob” (or “Israel”) in a prophetic or figurative context, the Scripture is not referring to ethnic Israel, but is referring to those people who truly follow and worship the LORD (Yahweh). The New Testament equivalent to “Jacob” (or “Israel”) is the true church of Jesus Christ made up of all those who have been chosen and then redeemed through their faith in the Messiah. If this hermeneutical point will be kept in mind when reading the Old Testament prophetic literature or the Psalms, it will make references to “Jacob” or to “Israel” easier to interpret.
The Brand-Marks of Jesus (#13)
“From now on let no one cause trouble for me, for I bear on my body the brand-marks of Jesus.” – the Apostle Paul in Galatians 6:17
In any context this verse would pull you up short and arrest your attention. Paul’s defense against the attacks of his critics is the scars that he has earned in the service of the Lord Jesus Christ. If you wanted to know what was inside Paul, you could look on the outside and see. The external scars for Jesus revealed the internal zeal for Christ. But what makes this verse even more profound is its specific context. Paul has spent most of this letter declaring to the Galatian believers that the external mark of circumcision has no value in your salvation. First he says, “. . . neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything.” Then he says again, “For neither is circumcision anything nor uncircumcision, but a new creation.” (Galatians 5:6; 6:15) But now in seeming contrast to what he has been saying in this epistle, he almost boasts in his external marks, “the brand-marks of Jesus,” that he has received on Christ’s behalf. What are these “brand-marks of Jesus?” These are the scars on the physical body received by those who proclaim Jesus in hostile places. Here are some thoughts about those brand-marks.
Consider how these brand-marks of Jesus are received. These are worn only by those who have gone to a place where the gospel of Jesus Christ is violently opposed and who, having gone to such a place, have boldly proclaimed that gospel, knowing the possible consequences of that proclamation. Thus the brand-marks of Jesus are a display of faithfulness and bold courage.
While the world prizes beauty and safety, the one who would bear the brand-marks of Jesus despises both beauty and safety and exalts in the honor of bearing shame and scars for Jesus’ sake. (Acts 5:41) It is remarkable that Paul repeatedly went to places where he would earn brand-marks. (Acts 9:15-16)
Consider how few believers are given the privilege of bearing the physical brand-marks of Jesus. While all believers are called to suffer for Jesus’ name (2 Tim. 3:12; Luke 9:23; Matthew 10:22; 24:9), not all believers suffer physical persecution and only a very few bear the brand-marks.
The brand-marks of Jesus are the world’s violent response to those who tell of the Prince of peace. Jesus Christ brings peace and love, yet those who proclaim His name often meet with the world’s violence and hatred.
While Paul has made clear in Galatians that the external “brand-mark” of circumcision has no value for righteousness or for justification before our holy God, and is actually anathema as part of another gospel (Galatians 1:6-9), the brand-marks of Jesus that he wears declare to his opponents his zeal for the true gospel of the Lord Jesus.
Application: Since most of those reading this (including the author) are probably not going to bear in their bodies the physical brand-marks of Jesus, how do we apply this teaching to our lives? I see two applications here. First, there is an application to our lives as believers regarding our call to suffer persecution. Second, there is an application to our lives in that, while we may not suffer the external brand-marks of Jesus, our lives should certainly be marked as belonging to the Lord and as distinct from the world.
So first, the gospels, Acts, the epistles and the book of Revelation all make clear that the follower of Jesus Christ EXPECTS to suffer for the name of Jesus (that is, he expects to suffer for the sole reason that he has become an obedient disciple of Jesus), the believer ENDURES suffering for the sake of Jesus (that is, the way the believer suffers is a testimony to Jesus Christ and should give glory to the Lord), and the believer EXALTS in suffering for the sake of Jesus (Romans 5:3; Acts 5:41). All suffering in the life of the believer is allowed by God to test and to strengthen the believer’s faith and to prove to the watching world the inestimable value of knowing Christ.
And second, in Galatians 6:17 Paul is certainly talking about physical scars which he has received in the service of our Lord Jesus Christ, marks that most of us will not experience. Nevertheless, despite the fact that our bodies will not bear the scars that Paul bore, our lives should be unmistakably marked because of our commitment to Jesus. That is, we ourselves also should bear the brand-marks of Jesus so that “no (can) cause trouble for us.” Our lives should be marked by a consistent holiness that is evident to others. In attitude, behavior, demeanor and character people should see obedience in our daily lives. The believer should bear the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). Our speech should be distinctly different from that of unbelievers, not only in the words that we say, but also in the gospel that we proclaim. In other words, the life of the believer should bear the brand-marks of Jesus by the distinct way that he lives, so that the world will be drawn to the Savior.
Being nice: Is that the aim? (#4)
It would be possible to get the impression that the goal of the Christian life is to become nicer. What I mean is that many in the realm of Christendom project the idea that the distinguishing characteristic of Christians is that they are nice. Thus if you encounter a person who is nice, you must have encountered a Christian. People who are of this mindset or who attend churches where the dominant thought is that being a Christian means being nice can very well become trapped in a prison of “nice” without ever encountering Jesus Christ and without ever being saved.
But the reality is that the awful violence done to Jesus Christ in His death on Calvary’s cross was not accomplished so that we could become nicer people. The wickedness of man and the twisted nature of the human heart and the wrath of God against sin were the issues that required Jesus’ death, and it had nothing to with how relatively nice people appeared to be.
Again, God did not have His Son murdered on a Roman cross so that you would be nice and go to a nice church and say nice prayers before dinner and at bedtime and so that you could say nice things to your neighbors. The death of Christ was not accomplished so that decent people could become nice. For the Bible makes clear that, while on the outside we may look upright and polite and nice, on the inside, in the heart we are desperately wicked (Jeremiah 17:9).
Please don’t get the idea that I am opposed to being nice. I like to be around nice people just like you do. What I am opposing is “nice” as an end in itself, as the goal of the believer’s life. Being outwardly nice is utterly insignificant for people who are inwardly wicked, perverse, selfish, shamed, hateful, and broken. The requirement to please God is perfect righteousness, not to present a thin veneer of niceness over an unconverted heart. So how do those who are unrighteous and those whose “every intention of the thoughts of their heart are only evil continually” (Genesis 6:5) approach the living God? How can the unrighteous be acceptable to a holy God? Do they resolve to be nice? No! They must encounter the risen Christ and believe in Him and repent of their sins and commit to follow Jesus for the rest of their life and for eternity. In so doing, they have been crucified with Christ (Gal. 2:20) and have been given the Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:13-14) so that all their sins are nailed forever to the cross. Thus the brokenness wrought by their sins can be exposed to the glorious light of Christ and can be redeemed, and those who once spent their lives in uselessness and wickedness can be gradually conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:29). And then, as their lives begin to take on a greater holiness, then, yes, they will probably become nicer people. But the aim is holiness and practical righteousness, not niceness.
Connectedness with the Creation (Genesis) Jan. 3, 2015
I have been struck by the connectedness between man and the rest of the creation that is evidenced in the early chapters of Genesis. It seems that the LORD intended for us humans to live in harmony with the creation, not in the situation where man abuses and exploits the creation. Notice the words that God says to the man and the woman in Genesis 1:28: “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” Man was to rule over the creation, he was not to destroy and exploit the creation. Yet in the world today man exploits the earth to satisfy his own greed.
There is a definite tenderness with which God entrusts His creation to mankind. He takes His treasured creation and gives it to man, with the hope that man will care for it and nurture it and that it will flourish under man’s watchful care. Later the LORD God places the man whom He had formed in the garden to cultivate it and keep it. (Genesis 2:8, 15) Again, the LORD God is entrusting the man with His creation. Throughout the early chapters of Genesis mankind is closely connected to the rest of creation.
But what do we experience today? Most of humanity is completely detached from the creation and is surrounded by humanity and technology and urban sprawl. This is a loss, in my opinion. How can I fulfill my role as one of the LORD’s vice-regents if I am disconnected from the creation I am called to steward? I think this is one of the reasons we are so empty in this age. We are enamored with our technology and obsessed with our buildings and our cars and our modern conveniences, but we are lacking any real connection to the rest of creation and from the earth that God created. This robs us of a very essential part of our humanity, of the thing that makes us human. Probably more importantly, we are not able to obey the “creation mandate” given to us by the Creator. Because we are disconnected from the rest of creation, we are unable to rule the earth and subdue it.
Insensitive to Sin (2 Samuel 11-12)
2 Samuel 11-12 and Psalm 51: How could David, the man after God’s own heart, go for more than a year as an adulterer and a murderer and not be particularly bothered by it and not feel the need to repent? How is it possible that he was so insensitive to his own sin? And if David was able to be so insensitive, is it possible that we, too, might get to a place in our spiritual lives where we are also insensitive to our sin? Surely this is a warning we need to explore.